Archive for March 3rd, 2006

Some more Cartoons against the Cartoon Jihad

Friday, March 3rd, 2006

Here are some more cartoons from people, mostly in Europe, who are trying to speak out against the so called Cartoon Jihad.
This page was in German, so I ran it through the Google Translator first.
Here is the original link.

Russia to Hamas: Honor PA agreements

Friday, March 3rd, 2006

I don’t think that hamas has the ability to change. They are more like a sect of islam than a political entity. Their desire to kill Jews runs much too deep. Once a slimy, pali terrorist, always a slimy pali terrorist.

Russia’s Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov warned Hamas on Friday that the Palestinian terrorist group will have no future if it fails to transform itself into a political institution. He called upon the organization to respect all of the previous agreements signed between Israel and the Palestinian Authority.
Lavrov said there was a “need for Hamas, having been elected to a political body, to transform itself into a political party and to be sure that the military wing of Hamas become a legitimate part of the Palestinian security structures.”
He spoke to the international media before talks with a Hamas delegation that arrived in Moscow Friday, the group’s highest-profile foreign visit since winning Palestinian parliamentary elections in January.
During their meeting, Lavrov said that Russia respects the Palestinian elections in which Hamas rose to power; he noted that they were free and fair. Hamas’ exiled political leader Khaled Mashaal expressed interest in Russia playing a special role in the middle east.
Russia’s invitation to Hamas, extended by President Vladimir Putin, was the first crack in an international front against the group, considered a terrorist organization by Israel, the European Union and the United States.
Russia aims to induce Hamas to back off its refusal to recognize Israel. But upon arrival in Moscow, Mashaal bluntly rejected any discussion of the issue.
“The issue of recognition [of Israel] is a decided issue,” Mashaal said. “We don’t intend to recognize Israel.”

Read the rest here.

We should fear Holland’s silence

Friday, March 3rd, 2006

All across Europe, the freedom to discuss islam is being silenced. Here is an excellent article by Douglas Murray, in the Times. If it happens there, it can happen here (in the U.S.)

Last weekend, four years after his murder, Pim Fortuyn’s political party, Lijst Pim Fortuyn, held a conference in his memory on Islam and Europe. The organisers had assembled nearly all the writers most critical of Islam’s current manifestation in the West. The American scholars Daniel Pipes and Robert Spencer were present, as were the Egyptian-Jewish exile and scholar of dhimmitude, Bat Ye’or, and the great Muslim apostate Ibn Warraq.


This may seem fantastic to people in Britain. But the story of Holland — which I have been charting for some years — should be noted by her allies. Where Holland has gone, Britain and the rest of Europe are following. The silencing happens bit by bit. A student paper in Britain that ran the Danish cartoons got pulped. A London magazine withdrew the cartoons from its website after the British police informed the editor they could not protect him, his staff, or his offices from attack. This happened only days before the police provided 500 officers to protect a “peaceful” Muslim protest in Trafalgar Square.

It seems the British police — who regularly provide protection for mosques (as they did after the 7/7 bombs) — were unable to send even one policeman to protect an organ of free speech. At the notorious London protests, Islamists were allowed to incite murder and bloodshed on the streets, but a passer-by objecting to these displays was threatened with detention for making trouble.

Holland — with its disproportionately high Muslim population — is the canary in the mine. Its once open society is closing, and Europe is closing slowly behind it. It looks, from Holland, like the twilight of liberalism — not the “liberalism” that is actually libertarianism, but the liberalism that is freedom. Not least freedom of expression.

All across Europe, debate on Islam is being stopped. Italy’s greatest living writer, Oriana Fallaci, soon comes up for trial in her home country, and in Britain the government seems intent on pushing through laws that would make truths about Islam and the conduct of its followers impossible to voice.

Those of us who write and talk on Islam thus get caught between those on our own side who are increasingly keen to prosecute and increasing numbers of militants threatening murder. In this situation, not only is free speech being shut down, but our nation’s security is being compromised.

Read the rest here.

Suicide bomber videos: Footage of hate

Friday, March 3rd, 2006

More messages of hate from the homicide bomber crowd.

An organization monitoring Palestinian media has compiled a collection of farewell videos of suicide bombers that demonstrate the virulent anti-Semitic message of the terrorists.
“The romanticized view of suicide terrorists in the Oscar-nominated Palestinian film ‘Paradise Now’ bears little resemblance to the real world of suicide bombers,” writes Itamar Marcus and Barbara Crook of Palestinian Media Watch. “The terrorist videos include calls for Israel’s destruction, the belief that killing Israelis will guarantee entrance into paradise and the belief that as reward for their terror, the men will marry maidens of paradise.”
Excerpts from the videos include the statements:
We are a nation that drinks blood, and we know that there is no blood better than the blood of Jews.
My dear mother … wipe your tears. … Don’t let me see you sad on my wedding day with the maidens of paradise.
Escort our souls to heaven after we fulfill this duty of crushing the descendents of monkeys and pigs.
I hoped that the shredded limbs of my body would be shrapnel, tearing the Zionists to pieces, knocking on heaven’s door with the skulls of Zionists. … My blood shall be my path to march to heaven.
The farewell video of Adham Ahmad Hujyla Abu Jandal was published on a Hamas website last month.
“My message to the loathed Jews is that there is no god but Allah [and] we will chase you everywhere!” stated the terrorists, who struck Dec. 7, 2004. “We are a nation that drinks blood, and we know that there is no blood better than the blood of Jews. We will not leave you alone until we have quenched our thirst with your blood, and our children’s thirst with your blood. We will not leave until you leave the Muslim countries. …”
Another video has Mu’min Rajab Rajab Abu Hafs saying, “”In the name of Allah, we will destroy you, blow you up, take revenge against you, purify the land of you, pigs that have defiled our country. … This operation is revenge against the sons of monkeys and pigs. …”
Other videos on PMW’s website are the final words of terrorists Al-Moayed Bihokmillah Al-Agha, Bassem Al-Takrouri and Mujahid Al-Jabari, and Reem Riyashi.

Re-Post: Are Christians Being Groomed to Accept The Coming Antichrist?

Friday, March 3rd, 2006

Are Christians Being Groomed to Accept The Coming Antichrist?
by Thomas Horn of Raider’s News Update

Today I learned that Madras High School in the little town of Madras, Oregon is the latest government institution to allow students to pay for their lunch with the swipe of a hand.
Only yesterday in a related event, Chief of Police Jack Schmidig of Bergen County, NJ, a member of the police force for over 30 years, received a VeriChip implant as part of Applied Digital Solution’s strategy of enlisting key regional leaders to accelerate adoption of its product.
Kevin H. McLaughlin, VeriChip Corporation’s CEO said of the event that “High-profile regional leaders are accepting the VeriChip, representing an excellent example of our approach to gaining adoption of the technology.”
The new and aggressive indoctrination program – Thought and Opinion Leaders to Play Key Role in Adoption of VeriChip – is intended to create widespread acceptance and exponential adaptation of the company’s FDA-cleared, human-implantable RFID tag.
Earlier this year ADS provided testimony that safeguards have been implemented to ensure privacy in connection with implantable microchips. ADS received patent rights to Digital Angel (TM) technology on December 10, 1999. What set Digital Angel apart from the competition was the innovative design–a miniature digital transceiver specifically created for human implantation. According to information released last year the implantable transceiver “sends and receives data and can be continuously tracked by GPS (Global Positioning Satellite) technology. The transceiver’s power supply and actuation system are unlike anything ever created. When implanted within a body, the device is powered electromechanically through the movement of muscles, and it can be activated either by the ‘wearer’ or by the monitoring facility.
An Information Technology report verified plans to study implantable chips as a method of tracking terrorists. After first pulling back from the implantable version of its Digital Angel, ADS foresees a unique use of its product under the new name VeriChip in the wake of terrorist attacks in New York and Washington. “We’ve changed out thinking since September 11,” a company spokesman said, “Now there’s more of a need to monitor evil activities.”
ADS also claims the VeriChip (Digital Angel) has a variety of other uses, such as “providing a tamper-proof means of identification for enhanced e-business security, animal tracking, locating lost or missing individuals, tracking the location of valuable property and monitoring the medical conditions of at-risk patients.”
Following the Internet World Wireless award for “Best of Show: Client Services,” Mercedes Walton, President and CEO of Applied Digital Solutions, said: We have always had high expectations for the Digital Angel products. This award is truly a validation of our faith in Digital Angel’s ability to capture the imagination of the public. Consumer anticipation has translated into accelerated interest from potential partners and allies. We are eager to bring Digital Angel to the marketplace in a very timely manner….”
To further advocate Digital Angel technology, Applied Digital Solutions launched a website where viewers can peruse diagrams and read summary information.
Other manufacturers of sub-skin implants have quietly field-tested similar devices over the past few years. The London Times reported that, “Film stars and the children of millionaires are among 45 people, including several Britons, who have been fitted with the chips (called the Sky Eye) in secret tests.”
Due to civil liberty and privacy issues, the ACLU announced opposition to mandatory microchip implantation when applied to humans. The ACLU is certain to be a strange bedfellow of conservatives concerning this issue.

Many people believe that, before long, an antichrist system will appear. It will be a New World Order, under which national boundaries dissolve, and ethnic groups, ideologies, religions, and economics from around the world will orchestrate a single and dominant sovereignty. The system will supposedly be free of religious and political extremes, and membership will tolerate the philosophical and cultural differences of its constituents. Except for minor nonconformities, war, terrorism, and hunger will be a thing of the past.
According to popular Biblical interpretation, a single personality will surface at the head of this utopian administration. He will appear as a man of distinguished character, but will ultimately become “a king of fierce countenance” (Dan. 8:23).
With imperious decree this Antichrist will facilitate the one-world government, universal religion, and globally monitored socialism. Those who refuse his New World Order will inevitably be imprisoned or destroyed, until at last he exalts himself “above all that is called God, or that is worshiped, so that he, as God, sitteth in the temple of God, showing himself that he is God” (2 Thess. 2:4).
The Antichrist’s widespread power will be derived at the expense of individual human liberties. He will force “all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads: And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name. Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six [666]” (Rev. 13:16-18).
For many years the idea that humans would somehow succumb to little more than branded cattle, and that rugged individualism would thereafter be sacrificed for an anesthetized universal harmony, was repudiated by America’s greatest minds.
Then, in the 1970’s, things began to change. Following a call by Nelson Rockefeller for the creation of a “New World Order,” presidential candidate Jimmy Carter campaigned, saying, “We must replace balance of power politics with world order politics.”
During the 1980’s, President George Bush continued the one-world dirge, announcing over national television that “a New World Order” had arrived. Following the initial broadcast, President Bush addressed the Congress, saying, “What is at stake is more than one small country [Kuwait], it is a big idea–a new world order, where diverse nations are drawn together in common cause to achieve the universal aspirations of mankind: peace and security, freedom, and the rule of law. Such is a world worthy of our struggle, and worthy of our children’s future!”
Ever since the President’s astonishing newscast, a parade of political and religious leaders have discharged a profusion of rhetoric aimed at implementing the goals of a New World Order.
Developers of biometric implant chips employ similar language in announcing compatible global technologies, and many Americans consider electronically marking humans or implanting a series of digital equations beneath the skin to be the natural progress of these advancing and necessary technologies.

Some people believe implantable microchips will become the Biblical Mark of the Beast. These claim that acts of terrorism such as the ones in New York and Washington, encourage microchipping humans for identification purposes.
Yet even before the New York and Pentagon tragedies, a push was being made to brand and monitor humanity.
Consider the following:
1, As far back as 1973, Senior Scholastics introduced school age children to the concept of buying and selling using numbers inserted in their forehead. In the September 20, 1973 feature “Who Is Watching You?” the secular high school journal speculated: “All buying and selling in the program will be done by computer. No currency, no change, no checks. In the program, people would receive a number that had been assigned them tattooed in their wrist or forehead. The number is put on by laser beam and cannot be felt. The number in the body is not seen with the naked eye and is as permanent as your fingerprints. All items of consumer goods will be marked with a computer mark. The computer outlet in the store which picks up the number on the items at the checkstand will also pick up the number in the person’s body and automatically total the price and deduct the amount from the person’s ‘Special Drawing Rights’ account.”
2, In the 1974 article “The Specter of Eugenics,” Charles Frankel pointed out Linus Pauling’s (Nobel Prize winner) suggestions that a mark be tattooed on the foot or forehead of every young person. Pauling envisioned a mark denoting genotype.
3, In 1980, U.S. News and World Report continued the warning, pointing out that the Federal Government was contemplating “National Identity Cards,” without which nobody could work or conduct business.
4, The Denver Post Sun followed up in 1981, claiming that chip implants could someday replace I.D. cards. The June 21, 1981 story read in part, “The chip is placed in a needle which is affixed to a simple syringe containing an anti-bacterial solution. The needle is capped and ready to forever identify something–or somebody.”
5, The May 7, 1996 Chicago Tribune questioned the technology, wondering aloud if we could trust Big Brother under our skin?
6, Then in 1997 applications for patents of subcutaneous implant devices for “a person or an animal” were applied for.
7, On April 27, 1998, Time Magazine ran the story, The Big Bank Theory And What It Says About The Future OF Money, in which they opined “Your daughter can store the money any way she wants–on her laptop, on a debit card, even (in the not too distant future) on a chip implanted under her skin.”
8, In August 1998 the BBC covered the first known human microchip implantation.
9, That same month the Sunday Portland Oregonian warned that proposed medical identifiers might erode privacy rights by tracking individuals through alphanumeric health identifier technologies. The startling Oregonian feature depicted humans with barcodes in their foreheads.
10, And recently millions of Today Show viewers watched as the decade of prophetic warnings materialized when an American family got “chipped” with ADS’s VeriChip™ live from a doctor’s office in Boca Raton.
Since then, it’s been business as usual with the chipping mantra.
Meanwhile, terrorism has many people in the mood to sacrifice their liberties… a National ID Bill Masquerading As Immigration Reform is moving through the US Congress… and Digital Angel has expanded its mass production factory in Palm Beach, Florida.

Makers of implantable microchips claim the procedure will continue to be voluntary. But a report written by Elaine M. Ramish for the Franklin Pierce Law Center says: “A [mandatory] national identification system via microchip implants could be achieved in two stages: Upon introduction as a voluntary system, the microchip implantation will appear to be palatable. After there is a familiarity with the procedure and a knowledge of its benefits, implantation would be mandatory.”
George Getz, the communications director for the Libertarian Party agrees, saying: “After all, the government has never forced anyone to have a driver license, [but] try getting along without one, when everyone from your local banker to the car rental man to the hotel operator to the grocery store requires one in order for you to take advantage of their services, that amounts to a de facto mandate. If the government can force you to surrender your fingerprints to get a drivers license, why can’t it force you to get a computer chip implant?”
People like Mr. Getz are correct. Conservatives and liberals alike need to contact state and federal representatives and demand laws preserving individual rights before Digital Angel and similar forces lead humanity down a high-tech path of no return.
In the same way Social Security numbers were voluntary before becoming mandatory, biometric chip implants will be compulsory in the future unless citizens take immediate and national opposition. Even Applied Digital Solution’s chief executive officer Richard Sullivan envisions a scenario where people [are] required to be chipped or [have] some combination of a device requiring them to be scanned and monitored at all times.” [Read]
Last but not least, note what the prophet said.
“And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark [charagma; (Greek charax) meaning to stake into or “stick into”] in their right hand, or in their foreheads: And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark…” — Rev. 13:16-17a
© 2005 – Thomas Horn – All Rights Reserved
Thomas is a nationally recognized lecturer, author, and businessman who has served 25 years in Christian ministry. A veteran speaker, researcher, and freelance writer, Tom has appeared on numerous radio and television programs worldwide, including Art Bell’s “Coast to Coast” and Pat Robertson’s “The 700 Club.” Tom’s new book ­ THE ARHIMAN GATE – fictionalizes ‘Big Brother’s’ role in the End Times. It is scheduled for release in the fall of 2005. E-Mail:

Note from Mike (at Rapture Alert. -ed.):
Before anyone starts e-mailing me asking why I’d place an article on my site with a title which suggests Christians could be groomed to accept the coming Antichrist, in light of my position that we will all be caught up to meet the Lord in the air at the pre-trib rapture before the Antichrist’s mark of the beast will become an issue, the answer is that Tom Horn put together, in this article originally published in 2005, a tremendous amount of information descriptive of how mankind is being groomed for the coming of the Antichrist and his mark of the beast.
I hope everyone who reads Tom’s article will absorb the information he gathered and reflect on what this valuable intelligence concerning the workings of darkness tells us in relation to how close we may be to hearing the Lord call us from a world that has forgotten its God, an event everyone knows I refer to as the Pre-Trib Rapture of the Church!
As my site’s regular visitors know, I’ve been reporting a great deal on RFID and implantable microchip technologies in the news since the last week of 2005. Why? Because the propagandizing of the past, in favor of a system like the prophesied mark of the beast being utilized, has been ramped up to a new level since then, demonstrating, in my opinion, that the public is swiftly becoming more acceptive of this technology all the time. And the churches of America? Are they sounding any warnings, as a whole? Certainly not, although I know, from opening my e-mail box alone, there are many pastors and churches that are sounding the alert that Jesus Christ is coming soon. Even so, these fine pastors and churches represent a minority of Christendom, which we need to see change – and quickly.

Kids’ TV More Violent Than Prime-Time, Study Finds

Friday, March 3rd, 2006

( – Television entertainment programs for young children contain much more violence than prime-time shows aimed at adults, according to a report released Thursday by a TV watchdog group.
In the study, entitled “Wolves in Sheep’s Clothing: A Content Analysis of Children’s Television,” the Parents Television Council (PTC) examined 443.5 hours of entertainment for youngsters 5 to 10 years of age.
The results of the PTC’s first examination of children’s shows were “frankly staggering,” according to the Center’s founder and president, L. Brent Bozell.
“Parents often take it for granted that children’s programs are by definition child-friendly,” said Bozell, who is also president of the Media Research Center and founder of Cybercast News Service. “Young children are especially impressionable, and they learn social norms and behaviors as readily from television as from their peers or parents.”
The new report “documents that ‘children’s television’ is no safe haven for children, and parents must be extremely vigilant as to what their children are watching, perhaps more so in this arena than in any other,” he added.
The PTC focused its analysis on after-school and Saturday morning shows during a three-week period in the summer of 2005 on four broadcast networks — ABC, Fox, NBC and the WB — and four cable channels — ABC Family, Cartoon Network, Disney Channel and Nickelodeon.
The study, which did not include children’s educational programming, found a total of 3,488 incidents of violence, for an average of 7.86 instances per hour, Bozell said.
Even when the innocent “cartoony” violence — such as an anvil falling on Wile E. Coyote’s head — was removed, there were still 2,794 instances of violence, an average of 6.30 instances per hour, he stated.

Read the rest here.