Archive for December 4th, 2008

“Hollywood’s Hatred of Christians Exposed Again” by Michael G. Mickey

Thursday, December 4th, 2008

Comedian Jack Black stars as Jesus Christ along with a cast of Hollywood stars who assail Christians and traditional family values in the three-minute musical embedded below.

Near the end of the video, the Christians, all dressed in black as if they’re villains or perhaps on their way to a funeral, see that gay marriage is good for the economy and embrace it.

Prior to the cast’s Christians tossing the Word of God aside in favor of an economic windfall, which we’ve seen pay off for California before in my humble opinion, ‘Jesus’ visits the stage with a shrimp cocktail in hand to tell them that the Bible considers many things to be wrong and an abomination – like shellfish, for example. I guess the scholarly Hollywood types have yet to hear that we are no longer bound by levitical dietary restrictions per Acts 10, but I digress as they know little to nothing about the Bible in general.

At least they’re consistent

Our world is becoming increasingly consistent in its hatred of Christians and more and more prepared to receive God’s judgment for its open rebellion against His commands. Soon, I fear for the lost, the festive singing and musical blasphemy embedded below is going to be over for them.

The Bible makes it clear – and in no uncertain terms – that when the world becomes as it was when Lot lived in Sodom, God is going to shake this world like a sapling in a hurricane!

Luke 17:28-30:

Likewise also as it was in the days of Lot; they did eat, they drank, they bought, they sold, they planted, they builded;

But the same day that Lot went out of Sodom it rained fire and brimstone from heaven, and destroyed them all.

Even thus shall it be in the day when the Son of man is revealed.

It’s coming around! It’s coming around as clear as crystal, isn’t it?

Funny or Die? You decide!

If you should elect to watch the video below, at the end of it you can vote to express your opinion of it! FUNNY or DIE are your voting options.

I would tell you to be sure to vote DIE but I’d best not lest I be accused of spreading HATE as Christians who voted for Proposition 8 are in the show.

The old satanic double standard

You’d think no one other than Christians (or Mormons) voted in favor of Prop 8 and that every single person who did so was motivated by their HATRED of homosexuals based on the mainstream media and Hollywood’s take on the issue, but the very same people who want everyone to believe that? They find it perfectly acceptable to deride, mock and villainize Christians openly, HATEFULLY even, going so far as to belittle Jesus Christ Himself! No HATRED there though, right?

If a group of Christians did anything of this nature in celebration of Proposition 8 passing? Even close for that matter? The whole liberal world would be up in arms! Funny how that works, isn’t it? It’s a Satan thing, you know?

Original Link.

“If this Isn’t Terrorism, What Is?” By Tom Gross

Thursday, December 4th, 2008

Last week in Mumbai we witnessed as clear a case of carefully planned mass terrorism as we are ever likely to see.

The seven-venue atrocity was coordinated in a highly sophisticated way. The terrorists used BlackBerrys to stay in touch with each other during their three-and-half-day rampage, outwitting the authorities by monitoring international reaction to the attacks on British, Urdu and Arabic Web sites. It was a meticulously organized operation aimed exclusively at civilian targets: two hospitals, a train station, two hotels, a leading tourist restaurant and a Jewish center.

There was nothing remotely random about it. This was no hostage standoff. The terrorists didn’t want to negotiate. They wanted to murder as many Hindus, Christians, Jews, atheists and other “infidels” as they could, and in as spectacular a manner as possible. In the Jewish center, some of the female victims even appear to have been tortured before being killed.

So why are so many prominent Western media reluctant to call the perpetrators terrorists? Why did Jon Snow, one of Britain’s most respected TV journalists, use the word “practitioners” when referring to the Mumbai terrorists? Was he perhaps confusing them with doctors?

Why did Britain’s highly regarded Channel 4 News state that the “militants” showed a “wanton disregard for race or creed” when exactly the opposite was true: Targets and victims were very carefully selected. Why did the “experts” invited to discuss the Mumbai attacks in one show on the state-funded Radio France Internationale, the voice of France around the world, harp on about Baruch Goldstein (who carried out the Hebron shootings in 1994), virtually the sole case of a Jewish terrorist in living memory?

Unfortunately in recent years we have become used to leftist media burying their heads in the sand about the threat that Islamic fundamentalism poses, in much the same way as they once refused to report accurately on communist atrocities. But now even conservative media may be doing it too.

What is the motivation of journalists in trying to mangle language — such as going out of their way to refer to terrorists as “militants,” as one Mumbai story on yesterday’s Times of London Web site seemed to do? Do they somehow wish to express sympathy for these murderers, or perhaps make their crimes seem almost acceptable? How are we going to effectively confront terrorists when we can’t even identify them as such?

But then the terrorists in Mumbai didn’t need to make any public announcements. They knew that many deluded Western journalists and academics will do that job for them, explaining that the West is to blame, especially the Zionists.

We have started seeing this already on the BBC — the world’s largest TV and radio network, which broadcasts in dozens of different languages around the world and is lavishly funded by the British taxpayer.

You would be hard pressed to find any talk of radical Islam on the BBC in recent days, or mention of the fact that Islamists think India should be a Muslim country. Instead the BBC continues to try to persuade its massive global audience that “it is a local Indian problem,” that “the subcontinent has a history of unrest,” and so on.

Even the Pakistani angle has been presented as some kind of local Pakistan-India dispute rather than as a problem with radical Islam — this despite the fact that according to numerous reports the Mumbai terrorists themselves were screaming “Allah Akbar” (Allah is the Greatest) as they murdered “the Jews and the infidels” in line with bin Ladenist ideology.

For some time, many have argued that an element of anti-Semitism has distorted the way the BBC covers the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. But now, following the Mumbai events, we can perhaps see that anti-Semitism may even be at work in the way the BBC covers foreign news in general. For much of the Mumbai siege, the BBC went out of its way to avoid reporting that the Jewish community center was one of the seven targets. At one point viewers were told that “an office building” had been targeted (referring to the Jewish center as such).

Read the rest of the article here.

Report: Israel Preparing to Strike Iran Without U.S. Consent

Thursday, December 4th, 2008

Israel recognizes the danger a nuclear Iran poses to them. The rest of the world can sit on it’s hands, but Israel cannot afford to allow a man who wants to “wipe [them] off the map” to have nuclear weapons.

Israel is drawing up plans to attack Iran’s nuclear facilities and is prepared to launch a strike without backing from the U.S., an Israeli newspaper reported Thursday.

Officials in the Israeli Defense Ministry told The Jerusalem Post that while they prefer to act in consultation with the U.S., they are preparing plans that would allow them to act alone.

“It is always better to coordinate,” a senior Defense Ministry official told the newspaper. “But we are also preparing options that do not include coordination.”

It would be difficult, but not impossible, to launch a strike against Iran without permission from the U.S., as the American Air Force controls the Iraqi airspace Israel’s jets would have to enter on a bombing mission.

“There are a wide range of risks one takes when embarking on such an operation,” a senior Israeli official told the Post.

Iran, the world’s fourth-largest crude oil producer, maintains that its uranium enrichment activities are aimed at making fuel for a network of planned electricity-generating nuclear power plants and not for developing weapons.

However Israel intelligence sources say Iran has sufficient nuclear material to make an atomic bomb.

Last month, amid mounting fears in Israel that the U.S. was doing nothing to prevent Iran from becoming a nuclear power, Ehud Olmert, Israel’s Prime Minister, warned President Bush the last chance of destroying Tehran’s nuclear bomb-making program was passing.

Original Link.

Report: School Cancels Traditional Christmas Play for Muslim Eid Celebrations

Thursday, December 4th, 2008

Here is the response to parents:
“A letter sent by school officials and obtained by the paper apologized for ‘any misunderstanding’ but said it had to respect ‘the cultures and religions of all the children.'”

“Respect ‘the cultures and religions of all the children.'” Unless they’re Christians, then it’s OK to trample all over one of their most holy holidays of the year.

Give me a break already!!

The nation of Great Islam (once referred to as Great Britain) will do anything to impose Islam on everyone and everything over all other wishes.

British parents looking to see their children in a traditional Christmas play are fuming after a school decided to cancel the performance because it conflicts with the Muslim festival of Eid al-Adha, the U.K.’s Telegraph newspaper reported.

Officials at the Greenwood Junior School in Nottingham decided to postpone the annual holiday performance because it would have been too difficult to have both the Christmas and Eid celebrations together, The Telegraph reported.

“It is the first year my son has been there and a lot of the mums like me were really looking forward to seeing the children in the nativity,” one mother told the paper.

A letter sent by school officials and obtained by the paper apologized for “any misunderstanding” but said it had to respect “the cultures and religions of all the children.”

“The Christmas performance has not been canceled outright but has been postponed until the New Year,” the letter read.

But parents told The Telegraph that they were originally told the performance was canceled because Muslim children wanted to celebrate Eid with their families, making it difficult to schedule a date for the performance.

Original Link.