Archive for June 17th, 2010

“A Medieval Kind of Evil” by Michael G. Mickey

Thursday, June 17th, 2010

Israeli Prime Minister Benjami Netanyahu said to his people on Monday (6-14-10), “Be prepared for difficult days.” Amen to that!

Currently, as though driven to near insanity, Israel’s enemies bent on her destruction are feverishly working at achieving their goal. Netanyahu put it like this:

“Dark forces from the Middle Ages are raging against us. I have received calls from concerned officials in the Balkans and Eastern Europe who are very worried about these developments.”

And…

“The flotilla to Gaza was not a one-time thing. We find ourselves in the midst of a difficult and continuous battle against the State of Israel. The flood of hate is being led by Israel’s enemies all over the world.

They are trying to pinch us with the metal pinchers of missiles and terror, and revoke Israel’s right to defend itself as well as the rights of IDF soldiers to protect their own lives.”

The prophesied time of Jacob’s trouble is fast approaching Israel it appears, Netanyahu correctly grasping that “dark forces” are raging against the descendants of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. On the upside, however, much as the troubling signs appearing in the world from the perspective of the Church remind us that our redemption draweth nigh, Israel has the promise of God on its side that its redemption is drawing near as well, although that isn’t something Israel, as a nation, is yet ready to accept. Let’s look at some scripture and gain some insight into where all of the anti-semitic hatred rearing its evil head at this hour is leading to.

Things to come

The current atmosphere in the tumultuous Middle East is only going to get worse for a time as many end times battles remain to be fought in the region prior to Israel’s redemption occurring, which will take place at the Second Coming of Jesus Christ.

Even though this is true, much having to occur before things get markedly better for Israel, a brighter day is coming into view on the prophetic horizon and more so, it seems, with every passing day.

Jeremiah 30:7 foretells that very difficult days lie ahead for Israel, just as their prime minister has said:

Alas! for that day is great, so that none is like it: it is even the time of Jacob’s trouble; but he shall be saved out of it.

How will things progress beyond the stressful environment Israel is presently living under until a time of trouble unlike any before it will beset the Jewish people? As those of us familiar with bible prophecy know, tensions like those presently visible in the Middle East are eventually going to provide the prophesied Antichrist with an opportunity to gain prominence on the world stage, his advent in the aftermath of the Rapture of the Church opening the seven-year Tribulation Period.

Initially seeming to be a friend of Israel, the Antichrist will confirm a seven-year covenant that will intrigue the world, presumably a peace agreement that will offer Israel the promise of peace and safety, but halfway through the seven-year covenant, the Antichrist’s true nature will be revealed and he will set his sights against Israel and its people in the Great Tribulation – the final three and a half years of the seven-year Tribulation Period to come.

Faced with the threat of destruction at the hands of another Hitler-like enemy seeking to wipe them from the face of the earth, Israel will come to call upon Jesus Christ at the height of the Antichrist’s satanically empowered rage against them, accepting Him as their Messiah at long last. This will set the stage for the return of Jesus Christ at Armageddon, after which the Jewish people will at last know peace.

Jeremiah 30:8-9:

For it shall come to pass in that day, saith the LORD of hosts, that I will break his yoke from off thy neck, and will burst thy bonds, and strangers shall no more serve themselves of him: But they shall serve the LORD their God, and David their king, whom I will raise up unto them.

The Son of David, Jesus Christ, is He who is going to break the yoke of the Antichrist from off Israel’s neck (Revelation 19:19-20) and He who is spoken of as their king in the preceding passage.

While a medieval kind of evil is gathering against Israel, at least from the perspective of their current leader, better and brighter days do lie ahead – days of complete victory for Israel. We have God’s sure word on it!

Speaking of Christ’s kingdom to come and Israel’s bright and peaceful future, the prophet Isaiah wrote, in Isaiah 9:7:

Of the increase of his government and peace there shall be no end, upon the throne of David, and upon his kingdom, to order it, and to establish it with judgment and with justice from henceforth even for ever. The zeal of the LORD of hosts will perform this.

Woe unto the enemies of Israel! While they are gathering like a pack of hungry wolves thirsty for Israel’s blood, their day is coming and when it arrives? They are going to learn the hard way that it is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living God! (Hebrews 10:31)

Keep looking up!

Original Link.

Obama Draws Bipartisan Criticism for Using Oil Spill to Push Energy Policy

Thursday, June 17th, 2010

“You don’t ever want a crisis to go to waste; it’s an opportunity to do important things that you would otherwise avoid.”
– Rahm Emanuel, Obama chief of staff

President Obama is drawing bipartisan criticism for using the BP oil spill to revive an energy regulation bill that’s been on the back burner since last year, with lawmakers saying the so-called “cap-and-trade” package does nothing to stop the leak or mitigate the damage.

Obama, trying to take control of a crisis that has slowly eroded support for his administration, addressed the nation from the Oval Office Tuesday night to rally support for his efforts to tackle the spill. He pointed to the relief efforts already underway and said the government would hold BP responsible. But later in his 18-minute speech, he turned to focus on the need to “seriously tackle our addiction to fossil fuels” and tout Democrats’ climate legislation.

“We can’t afford not to change how we produce and use energy, because the long-term costs to our economy, our national security and our environment are far greater,” Obama said in the first Oval Office address of his presidency.

While the president was taking the long view, lawmakers said that’s not the kind of response Gulf residents suffering immediate economic and environmental damage need.

“If my house is on fire, I don’t need the fire chief telling me I should not have built the house out of wood. I need somebody to put the fire out,” Republican Alabama Gov. Bob Riley told Fox News on Wednesday. “We have a crisis here. … Last night, we were going through again the same type of rhetorical persuasion that the president is very good at, but not now.”

Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., was quoted by The San Francisco Chronicle saying, “the climate bill isn’t going to stop the oil leak.” Stopping the leak should come first, she said.

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell said he agrees with Feinstein and that the energy policy proposed by Obama will not help Gulf residents in the near-term.

“What they’re doing here in effect is holding the Gulf hostage to a national energy tax,” he told Fox News.

The speech came 57 days after the April 20 explosion at the Deepwater Horizon oil rig that killed 11 workers and sparked the crisis, in which millions of gallons of oil already have spilled into the Gulf of Mexico. The speech also served as a prelude to Obama’s meeting Wednesday with BP executives at the White House. Obama plans to press executives to set up an escrow account to pay economic damages to Gulf residents.

In his speech, Obama called on all Americans to contribute to “a new future that will benefit all of us.” He used similar language to kick-start action on his health care overhaul last year.

“As we recover from this recession, the transition to clean energy has the potential to grow our economy and create millions of good, middle-class jobs, but only if we accelerate that transition,” Obama said. “Only if we seize the moment. And only if we rally together and act as one nation — workers and entrepreneurs; scientists and citizens; the public and private sectors.”

Original Link.

Custody Battle Keeps Arizona Mom and Daughter Stuck in Bahrain

Thursday, June 17th, 2010

A common tactic of Muslim men, when facing custody battles, is to lure the mother and child back to their native Muslim country, where women have few if any rights. This allows the man to pretty much take the child away from the mother. The courts, in those countries, are almost never sympathetic to the mother, or grant custody of the child to her.

EXCLUSIVE: Yazmin Maribel Bautista wants desperately to get out of Bahrain, but she says she won’t return home to the U.S. without her 5-year-old daughter — and that’s something her ex-husband says will never happen.

Bautista, 43, of Phoenix, is locked in a bitter child custody dispute with her 28-year-old ex-husband, Sadiq Jaffar Al-Saffar, over their daughter Fatima, who was born in 2004 when her parents lived in Arizona.

Fatima wasn’t even 2 years old when her father left her mother and went home to his native Bahrain, where he got engaged to a much younger woman. But despite having been abandoned, Bautista traveled to visit with her ex-husband in Bahrain last year, lured by the promise of a new job and a chance for her daughter to spend time with her father — an information technology worker — in his native country.

But now that his ex-wife and daughter are in Bahrain, Al-Saffar has filed for custody of the little girl — and a judge in the small Mideast country has ruled that the little girl, a native-born American, cannot go home with her mom.

Bautista, who also has a son from a previous relationship, says she and Fatima were blocked from leaving Bahrain on two occasions last year — on Sept. 26 and Oct. 19. On one occasion, she said, officials from the U.S. Embassy there advised her to speak with a judge after clearing immigration.

“Once you talk to him, you and Fatima can go your way,” Bautista recalled the embassy official saying.

But “[t]he judge told me Fatima could not leave Bahrain because her father did not want her to leave,” Bautista says. “They told me, ‘If you want to leave, you can leave. But the girl stays.’ Obviously, I wasn’t going to leave my baby.”

That “nightmare,” as Bautista calls it, occurred nine months ago, and it caught the eye of her senator, John McCain, who sent a letter in January to Bahraini Ambassador Houde Erza Ebrahim Nonoo, urging her to “expeditiously resolve” the custody dispute and allow Bautista and Fatima to return home. State Department officials in Washington also are closely following the case.

Alongside her daughter, who she said cries constantly and has too many “blue days” away from home, a broke, unemployed and nearly broken Bautista said in an interview that she continues to stay with friends in Bahrain while awaiting her next court date on June 23. That’s when witnesses will be asked to testify on her competency as a mother, she said.

“Fatima is not the same little girl she was when she arrived in Bahrain,” Bautista said. “She has crying spells. She misses home, she misses her brother. That’s where our home is — our home is in Arizona.”

Al-Saffar, meanwhile, accused Bautista of not adhering to their custodial arrangement, which grants him custody of Fatima three days a week. He is now seeking full custody of the little girl, he told FoxNews.com.

“What she’s trying to do is take my daughter back to Phoenix so I cannot see her,” Al-Saffar said. “She just wants to take my daughter and leave. She’s completely abandoning me from my daughter.”

Al-Saffar said he hasn’t seen Fatima for more than a month, and the ongoing turmoil is “not something that’s good” for his daughter. He claims Bautista tried to leave the country without his knowledge after he arranged a teaching job for her last August.

“She did not even call me to let me say goodbye to my daughter,” Al-Saffar said. “I did not even know she was taking my daughter and actually leaving.”

Al-Saffar said he learned of Bautista’s attempt to leave the country only because he received an e-mail notification related to the airline ticket he purchased for her.

“If she were to have left, I would have never seen my daughter again,” he said. “I will never get a visa.”

Al-Saffar denied allegations that he lured his ex-wife to Bahrain under the pretense of setting her up with a job and a place to stay in his family’s residence with the intention of trapping her there.

“I do confirm that this is not true,” he said. “Why would I wait until the last minute?”

Bautista said she and Al-Saffar met in early 2004 at a café in Tempe, Ariz. She said Al-Saffar, a student at Arizona State University, told one of her friends that he was interested in her. On May 27, 2004, they married in a civil court ceremony. Bautista was five-months pregnant at the time, she said.

“We had good times at the beginning,” she said. “We tried to have a happy life; to have a happy relationship.”

She said she supported the family while her husband studied computer engineering. Fatima was born on Oct. 14, 2004, just months before Al-Saffar’s graduation.

The first sign of trouble came when Al-Saffar’s father came to visit from Bahrain, Bautista said. She said her husband’s family was unaware that the two had married and that they had a baby daughter.

“I really don’t know what my husband told his father at the time, but I told him, ‘We are a family now, we have Fatima,'” she said. “He was hiding Fatima from [his family] as well. I wanted him to tell his family that he’s a married man with a daughter.”

Al-Saffar traveled to Bahrain in January 2005, only to return to Phoenix in April, when he got a job working at an airline. He returned to Bahrain in September 2005, Bautista said. It was at the airport, she says, that she found out it was the beginning of the end.

“He told me, ‘By the way, I am not coming back, I am staying in Bahrain,'” she said. “I asked him to please stay until her first birthday, but he said, ‘I can’t, I can’t, I can’t.'”

Aside from sporadic phone calls, Bautista said she did not hear from Al-Saffar again until February 2006, when he returned to Phoenix to spend two weeks with his sister. She said Al-Saffar declined to take her and Fatima back to Bahrain, and she said her sister-in-law told her she would never be part of their Muslim family.

Al-Saffar left Arizona again and returned in September 2006 — this time as a newly engaged man. At the time, Bautista said she no idea that her husband had found love elsewhere.

“He used my house like a hotel, he slept there but spent all his time with his friends,” she said. “He was acting different, so I asked him, ‘Do you have somebody else?'”

Al-Saffar told FoxNews.com he became engaged to his second wife in early 2006 but waited until 2008 to remarry in Bahrain. Bautista says Al-Saffar admitted to marrying someone else as early as April 2006.

“She is a Muslim and, of course, she’s younger,” Bautista said of Al-Saffar’s 24-year-old wife. “He actually took me for a ride. Was he planning this from the beginning? Probably — I believe it was a game to him. ”

Bautista filed for divorce in 2008 and, by last August, the couple had been working on a plan to unite Fatima with her father and to arrange a job for Bautista, who was unemployed at the time. On the promise of an apartment, a job and other amenities, Bautista agreed to go to Bahrain to “see how it was,” she said.

“I left my family, my friends and my son to give it a try, to bring Fatima to her father,” she said. “I was very naïve, yes, I know. And, like an idiot, I went back to Bahrain with my daughter.”

Once at the Al-Saffar home, Bautista said her ex-husband’s relatives told her she was not to be alone in the same room with Al-Saffar, and they accused her of trying to ruin his new marriage.

“They weren’t accepting of me,” she said. “They wanted to take my daughter from me.”

The hostile living situation ultimately drove her to live in a hotel, and eventually in a homeless shelter when funds ran dry.

“That was the most depressing thing that I’ve gone through,” Bautista said. “I had never set foot in a shelter before.”

Bautista’s plight caught McCain’s attention in January, when he wrote to Bahrain’s ambassador calling for “urgent personal attention” to the matter.

“Ms. Bautista contends that she, not Mr. Al-Saffar, is the legal custodian of their daughter,” McCain’s letter read. “She states that she was granted both a legal divorce from Mr. Al-Saffar and sole custody of Fatima by the Superior Court of Arizona in the United States of America. Ms. Bautista further notes that Mr. Al-Saffar signed legal documentation acknowledging that he was aware of said legal proceedings in Arizona and that he agreed to submit to the court’s jurisdiction.”

Through a spokeswoman, McCain declined comment for this article, including whether embassy officials had responded to his inquiry.

Sahar Hakeem, Ambassador Nonoo’s secretary, said the ambassador was out of the country due to a medical issue and was unreachable. Hakeem had told FoxNews.com on Tuesday that “no one” in the embassy in Washington was aware of Bautista’s case.

Andy Laine, a spokesman for the U.S. Department of State, said the agency and the U.S. Embassy in Manama were “closely” following the case.

“The U.S. Embassy in Manama continues to raise this case with the government of Bahrain to ensure it receives the attention it deserves,” Laine wrote FoxNews.com.

Meanwhile, Edgar Bautista, Yazmin Bautista’s 24-year-old son, is hopeful he will soon be reunited with his mother and half-sister. They have not spoken in more than two weeks, he said.

“It’s kind of hard to keep in touch,” he told FoxNews.com. “I just want my mom and my sister to come back home to Phoenix, to just come back to their regular lives and more forward.”

Bautista said she wants the exact same thing for her daughter.

“This is not life for us,” she said. “We’re going back.”

Original Link.