It grows increasingly clear that the GOP, led by President George W Bush is willing to commit political suicide, if that is what it takes, in order to leave the US southern border as wide-open as possible.
What is far less clear is why. Thanks to years of pounding over an issue that actually DID address national security — the war in Iraq — President Bush’s approval rating has dropped to just thirty percent.
Now, he appears willing to sever ties with his few remaining supporters by refusing to modify his position on immigration ‘reform.’
I’ve understood — and even applauded Bush’s stubborn ’stick-to-it-ness” over the war in Iraq. The opposition he’s faced on that issue is purely political.
In terms of national security, Iraq is a no-brainer.
After all, the performance of the Department of Homeland Security has not exactly been stellar since September 11.
Immediately after the attacks on the homeland nearly six years ago, citizens were enlisted in the war on terror by being urged by Homeland Security to “be vigilant” and to report suspicious activity to the nearest law enforcement authorities.
Remember the case of the “Flying Imams”? Six Muslim imams were removed from US Airways Flight 300, from Minneapolis, Minnesota to Phoenix, Arizona, at 6:30 PM on November 20, 2006.
The removal of the imams was initiated when several passengers, as well as crew, became alarmed by what they ‘felt’ was ’suspicious behavior.’
You tell me:
1. Before boarding the aircraft, the imams made a point of conducting long, loud Islamic prayer rituals obviously calculated to frighten passengers.
2. The imams refused to sit in their assigned sears. Instead, they fanned out in the cabin, sitting in pairs close to the front, middle and rear exit rows.
3. Three of them requested seat belt extenders. Seat belt extenders are straps with large metal buckles normally used by obese passengers to lengthen their seatbelts.
None of them were obese. None of them attached the extenders. Instead, they placed them on the floor in front of their seats. (Seat belt extenders would make formidable weapons in the confined space of an aircraft.)
4. Three of them were traveling with no checked baggage and one-way tickets.
5. Two of the imams were overheard by an Arabic-speaking passenger condemning America for ‘killing Saddam’ and praising Osama bin Laden.
The passengers did EXACTLY what the Department of Homeland Security told them to do. They alerted the crew, who, on board an aircraft, are the ‘nearest law enforcement authority.’
The crew did EXACTLY what the DHS recommendations and FAA regulations require. They put the safety of the aircraft and its passengers first, and had the six removed from the aircraft by police.
What happened? They got sued by the imams.
What did the Department of Homeland Security do? Faced with charges of ‘racial profiling’ and lawsuits from the Council on Islamic American Relations (CAIR) they backed down and officially blamed the passengers, claiming that they ‘behaved hysterically’.
This was neither the first nor the last time that the DHS ducked for cover and threw the concerned citizens to CAIR’s legal wolfpack.
Nor is it the most egregious example of the DHS’s incredible incompetence. Does anybody remember Hurricane Katrina?
But, despite DHS’s dismal record, there have been no successful major attacks against the US homeland since 9/11. Why? Because the enemy has his attention focused on Iraq.
That is why I said at the outset that Bush’s approval rating plunge over the Iraq war was political, and why the justification for the Iraq war was a ‘no brainer’. Chalk one up for Bush and the GOP for supporting him.
But nobody in their right mind could support him on the ‘immigration reform’ package he is so determined to foist on America.
Bush went on the offensive against his own supporters this week, telling the McClatchy newspaper group; “People shouldn’t fear our capacity to uphold our motto, E Pluribus Unum.”
(”E Pluribus Unum” is Latin for “Out of Many, One”)
The implication is that America is a land of immigrants, and therefore, it should accept all immigrants. But those who have entered the country illegally are not “immigrants”. They are illegal aliens.
“I feel passionate about the issue. It’s something I have felt strongly about ever since I was the governor of Texas,” Bush said.
The problem is, President Bush isn’t the president of Texas. He is the president of the whole United States. Personally, I like Texas. (I am Texas at this very moment.)
Bush is framing the immigration issue as being one of race. It isn’t an issue of race. Race doesn’t even enter into the equation. Race is being used to sweep the real issues under the rug.
The first issue is the legal one. Illegal immigration is, well, illegal. Not liking a law is hardly grounds for ignoring it.
The second, and more important issue, is national security. As it stands, nobody knows who is coming into America, from where, for what reason, or where they are at this moment.
While the President insults his diminishing support base by calling them racists, Hugo Chavez is importing terrorists into Venezuela via the Tehran-Damascus-Caracas air corridor. Terrorists can fly from Tehran or Damascus to the Western Hemisphere without worrying about excessive scrutiny.
Once in Caracas, Chavez issues them Venezuelan documents and passports.
Armed with these documents, they can make their way north to the border (a number of Middle Easterners have already been intercepted along the US southern border in possession of such documents), and join the mass exodus of Latinos sneaking across the border hoping for a better life.
Except they are not seeking a better life for themselves. They are seeking to take yours away from you.
Not wanting to be a victim of a terrorist attack isn’t racist. Anymore than the passengers and crew of Flight 300 not wanting to risk becoming part of a missile were Islamphobic.
President Bush should be able to understand the problem. It isn’t like he doesn’t have advisors. He has millions of them. They are called voters. And they don’t like it one bit.
About 72 percent of voters of all political persuasions, according to a new Rassussen poll, say it’s “very important” for “the government to improve its enforcement of the borders and reduce illegal immigration.”
More significantly, among Republicans, that number jumps to 89%. The RNC just laid off its entire staff of phone solicitors. The reason? Republicans have stopped donating to the RNC. Why? Border security.
“Every donor in 50 states we reached has been angry, especially in the last month and a half, and for 99 percent of them immigration is the No. 1 issue,” a fired phone-bank employee told the Washington Times.
A WND report last week quoted one fired phone bank employee, who said, “We have not heard anyone in our donor calls who supported the president on immigration. . . We write these comments up from each call, and give them to a supervisor who passes them on to the finance director or the national chairman,” he said. “But when I talked with the White House, the people there told me they got nothing but positive comments on the president’s immigration stand.”
Really? From whom? The 11% of Republicans who DON’T oppose the bill?
Why would Bush push forward with a plan that threatens to tank his own party in the next election? What is so vital about NOT securing America’s borders?
I listened to Michael Medved the other night on TV, completely wigging out over the Security and Prosperity Plan that envisions a North American Union between the US, Canada and Mexico.
(It suddenly occurs to me that such a union could be scuttled, should the US suddenly tighten its borders.)
Meved was practically sputtering, calling those who believe that the SPP plan is an end-run around US sovereignty “losers” and “paranoid alarmists and sicko fear-peddlers”.
Maybe I’m just another loser and paranoid alarmist and sicko-fear peddler. But my first thought was a quote from Shakespeare; “methinks he doth protest too much.”
The next thought to come to mind were two passages of Scripture: “There is a way which seemeth right unto a man, but the end thereof are the ways of death.” (Proverbs 14:12, 16:25) and; “The wicked flee when no man pursueth. . . (Proverbs 28:1)
Food for thought.
Original Link.